Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shane
I don't know why Hollywood has this obsession with having superheroes fight two different villains. Instead of being able to focus on one, they have to clutter things up with multiple opponents (Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man 3, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, etc.). I agree that Two-Face would've been a great villain to have featured in the next movie. A much better choice than the Riddler, in my opinion.
The only thing I would disagree with was Katie Holmes being replaced by Maggie Gyllenhall. While Maggie (I hate typing her last name) is a much better actress, I thought she looked downright haggard in the film. Then again, her character wasn't really called on to do much of anything besides getting blown to pieces. I'd actually love to see one of these movies where the filmmakers don't insist on forcing in the romantic interest. Who the hell cares about such things in a superhero movie, anyway (unless, of course, it's central to the plot, such as the relationship between Peter and Mary Jane)?
|
I totally agree with both your points (though I'm sticking with my previous statement that Maggie was a better call... she's a much better actress, and while she's not as pretty but I don't think she's supposed to be a knockout). I am equally annoyed at Big Budget movies shoving in all these elements that make up "the required template" for an action movie (love interests, multiple bad guys, etc). And not just action movies, they do it for everything. So annoying! Where is the originality?!? Just saw No Country for Old Men again, and what a great ending. But because it didn't fit the formula and tie the story up in a nice little bow, most people hated the ending. I thought it was brilliant. Three cheers for the Coen brothers for actually showing some artistic license (as they always do!).